Impact of the Station-Rotation Blended Learning Design on Motivation and Educational Attainment in Genetics at Secondary level Slow Learners in Zaria, Nigeria
Abstract
The present study explored the Impact of the Station-Rotation Mixed-Mode Learning on Motivation and Genetics achievement of School Slow Learners in Zaria, Nigeria. The study adopted a quasi-experimental and control group design. The study’s population comprises of 8,439 (4853 males and 3586 females in 29 schools. The sample of the study comprised of two intact classes of 61 slow learners (20 students from experimental group and 31students from the control group). The experimental group was taught utilising the Station-Rotation Blended Learning instruction, whereas the control group was instructed utilising the conventional teaching method. Two instruments were used for data collection, they were Genetics Performance Test (GPT) and Genetics Concept Motivation Questionnaire (GCMQ). The two instruments were validated by three experts in Science Education and Psychology. The reliability tests for GPT were obtained using a test-retest procedure while the coefficients were established using Pearson’s Product- Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC) which was found to be 0.74. Cronbach’s alpha statistic was used to compute the reliability coefficients of GCMQ and GPT which were found to be 0.83 and 0.76 respectively. The research questions were addressed using Mean and Standard Deviation, as well as Mean Rank and Sum of Mean Ranks, while the null hypotheses were tested using the t-test and the Mann-Whitney H-test at a significance level of p < 0.05. Among the findings, it was established that there is a substantial disparity in the academic performance mean scores of students taught genetics utilizing the Station-Rotation Blended Instruction compared to those taught utilising the conventional method. Consequently, it is recommended that biology teachers adopt the Station-Rotation Blended Learning strategy for teaching genetics.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adah, S. A. (2023). Envisioning Global Security for Sustainable National Development in Nigeria: The Role of Science and Technology Education. British Journal of Education, 11(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2023/vol11n13644
Akpan, K. F. & Aminikpo N. R. (2023). Station-rotation learning approach on students’ academic achievement and retention: A case study of air force secondary school rivers state, Nigeria. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy 3 (10), 376-383, 2019.
Anggi A. (2022). Individual Educational Program for Slow Learner. Psycho Holistic, 4(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.35747/ph.v4i2.423
Arcos Garcia, P. (2021). Analyzing the impact of digital literacy on student academic performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 419-435.
Chakraborty, D. (2021). Historical Background behind the Innovation of Science. Indian Science Cruiser, 35(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.24906/isc/2021/v35/i1/208406
Dari, U., Halim, A., & Ilyas, S. (2022). Influence of the Use of the Approach of Blended Learning Model Rotation Based Moodle on Motivation and Cognitive Abilities of Students in the Subjects of Physics. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1100
Fernando, N. Y., Andriani, N. P., & None Hidayani Syam. (2024). Pentingnya Motivasi Belajar Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. ALFIHRIS Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 2(3), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.59246/alfihris.v2i3.843
Iksan, H. Z. & Daniel, E. (2019). Types of Wait-Times During Verbal Questioning In Science Classroom. Journal Of International Research In Higher Education, 1(1), 72-80.
Khalmatova, Z., & Ekti̇M. (2023). A Determination Regarding the Application of Station Rotation Online Teaching Model in Foreign Language Teaching. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, 1407–1427. https://doi.org/10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1387425
Kim, D., Lee, Y., Han, E., & An, Y. (2022). Exploring the Classification of Slow Learners based on Intelligence and Academic Achievement Criteria: Focusing on Intellectual Disability, Learning Disability, Borderline Intellectual Functioning. The Korea Learning Disabilities Association, 19(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.47635/kjld.2022.19.1.25
Lee, S.-Y., & Cheon, K.-A. (2024). Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Slow Learners (Borderline Intellectual Functioning). Journal of Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.240010
Liu Jingtao. (2023). Impact of the Station Rotation Model of Blended Learning on EFL College Students’ Listening Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i12/19490
Mahmudova, K. F. (2024). Biologiya fƏnnin hƏytİ eHƏMİYYƏTİ. The Actual Problems of Study of Humanities, 2(2024), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.62021/0026-0028.2024.2.221
Marianne, C, Maxima & J. A., (2018). Blended learning station-rotation model: Effects on grade 10 students’ performance and attitude toward mathematics Mathematics City of Bacoor National High School–Green Valley. Electronic Proceedings of the 23rd Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics.
Martyn , M. (2015)The hybrid online model: Good Practice. Educouse Quarterly , 1, 8-23
Ortega Gill, S. & Arcos Garcia, P. (2022). Impact of gamification on student engagement in online
learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 120
Mikawati, M., & Susianna, N. (2024). Penerapan Model Station Rotation untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(11), 4606–4626. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i11.1580
Rahman, Z., Rijanto, T., Basuki, I., & Sumbawati, M. S. (2020). The Implementation of Blended Learning Model on Motivation and Students’ Learning Achievement. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i9.2694
Shafie, A. (2024). Station Rotation Gamification in Education to Increase Students’ Engagement Levels. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 2417–2427. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/21108
Sherina L. (2015). Blended learning case study: the application of the station rotation model in English Language Teaching in listening and speaking class at PhayaoPittayakhom School, Thailand. International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Education, 129-141, 2015
Syafii, A., Raja, P., & Ari Nurweni. (2016). Blended learning to enhance students’ motivation in vocational school. U-JET, 5(2).
Tri M., Dwi W., & Sovia, A. (2023). Identify Slow Learners in Math: Case Study in Rural Schools. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(06), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i06.36903
Tzovla, E., & Kedraka, K. (2020). Teaching Biology in Primary Education. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 8(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.82.91.97
Vallerand, R. J. & Ryan,R.M.(2019). Handbook of Intrinsic Motivation. Guilford Press
Violetta, Y., Svitlana. B., Olena, B., Hubal, H., & Uliana, B. (2024). Station-Rotation model of blended learning in higher education. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 16(41), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v16i41.11434
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.